DR BOOLELL A, GOSK v THE SPEAKER OF NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, HON SOOROOJDEV PHOKEER, GCSK, GOSK & ANOR 2026 SCJ315 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS SCR No. 121978-1/217/21 A very interesting Judgment [ the plaint is set aside with costs ] and I have always been a FAN of the former SPEAKER PHOKEER and still a FAN till date. Infact in that case Hon Boolell ( const 18) was ORDERED OUT and SUSPENDED from the National Assembly and he had put matter to Court. In the mean time there was a change in Government and Speaker , and the case died out naturally but NOW Hon Boolell ( const 18) wanted to put the case ' To their NAMES' , as if CIVIL. This legal procedure FAILED BADLY and the case was set aside with Costs.
Ref 187, 25 06 26 : Pension Saga : I wish to notify both sides, NOT TO DRAG me any further into this discussion of Pension Saga also. Several sides 'want me to talk about that' and then they will say I do Politics . I had provided my SUGGESTIONS that were not listened to. Budget 26/27 was a disaster. Const 8 was excluded from my mailing list due to that Amateurism. BOTH SIDES SHOULD have a look again at what I had said To the Commission of Experts on Pension back in 08/11/25 and the country and Parliament would not have been in such a situation. https://ar-mr-spirit-of-the-law.blogspot.com/2025/11/chagos-11-good-initiative-for-public.htmL. Same as CHAGOS/COFFERS SAGA/ building back damaged infront of Casern / BAGS SAGA..; Politics should not DRAG me into that also. I move out of this discussion of Pension. Opposition sides are free to READ AGAIN what I had said To the Commission of Experts on Pension back in 08/11/25 and adopt those measures AS THEIR OWN.GRADUAL INCREASE IN PENSION AGE to 65 instead of sudden increase to 65, among other propositions even about the way to do TARGETING. What has been done is AMATEURISM.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)